Maintenance technician killed by robot at Ventra Ionia auto parts plant
A 57-year-old maintenance technician was crushed by a robot in a trailer-hitch assembly line at the Ventra Ionia Main plant in Ionia, Michigan, on July 7, 2015.
Key facts
- On July 7, 2015, a maintenance technician at Ventra Ionia Main in Ionia, Michigan, was fatally crushed by a robot; OSHA's fatality summary records the cause as a robotic arm.
- Michigan inspectors said a lockout device could have halted the machine when the technician entered the robotic cell, and proposed a $7,000 fine.
- A 2017 wrongful-death lawsuit alleged that a robot from an adjoining section entered the section where the technician was working and that safety systems failed.
- A federal court's 2021 account, as summarized in legal commentary, was that the technician climbed over a wall without using the zone's entry procedure and that the robot operated as programmed.
- The 2021 ruling treated the line's control programming as an integral part of a product for purposes of Michigan's product liability statute.
What happened
Ventra Ionia Main, an affiliate of auto supplier Flex-N-Gate, made bumpers, trailer hitches and plastic parts in Ionia, about 130 miles west of Detroit. One line used robots to assemble and weld trailer hitch receiver assemblies and was divided into zones separated by safety walls and doors.
At about 2:20 p.m. on Tuesday, July 7, 2015, the Ionia Public Safety Department was told that an employee was trapped in machinery. Officers and coworkers freed her, and she was pronounced dead at the plant. She was a 57-year-old journeyman maintenance technician.
Accounts of how it happened differ. The lawsuit filed by her husband in 2017 alleged that she was inspecting machinery in one section when a robot from a neighboring section entered unexpectedly and crushed her head between a hitch assembly it was loading and one already in the fixture, and that safety doors meant to stop robot movement did not work. A federal court’s September 2021 opinion, as described in a legal commentary, said that workers were supposed to press a button, wait for a green light and lock the zone door open before entering, which would power down the robots in that zone. According to that account, she instead climbed over a wall, and a robot from another section, operating as programmed, entered the zone and crushed her.
The system involved
The line was designed, built and installed by Prodomax Automation, with robots supplied by other manufacturers. Each zone had an entry procedure that removed power from the robots in that zone. According to the 2021 court account, the robot that struck the technician came from an adjoining section and was following its program. The line was later reprogrammed so that all robots powered down whenever a zone door was opened.
Investigation and response
The Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration investigated. In January 2016 the Associated Press reported that state regulators had proposed a $7,000 fine and that inspectors said a lockout device could have halted the machine when the technician entered the robotic cell. The plant’s general manager declined to comment. Ventra settled a workers’ compensation claim related to the death in 2016.
In March 2017 the technician’s husband sued six companies in federal court in western Michigan, including Prodomax, Flex-N-Gate and robot manufacturers. In November 2020 the court declined, for the time being, to dismiss Flex-N-Gate on workers’ compensation grounds. In September 2021 the court ruled on summary judgment motions. The robot manufacturers had already been dismissed and Flex-N-Gate was dismissed; common-law negligence claims were held to be displaced by Michigan’s product liability statute; and a design-defect claim over the line’s programming went forward against Prodomax. The court found that climbing the walls was a foreseeable misuse. Bloomberg Law reported on November 9, 2021, that the estate and Prodomax reached a confidential settlement in the middle of trial.
What is not established
The lawsuit’s account and the court’s later account of how the technician came to be in the robot’s path differ, and no public investigation report resolving the point was located. Whether Ventra contested the proposed state fine, and the terms of the 2021 settlement, are not known. No appellate decision in the case was located.
Outcomes
- In January 2016 Michigan regulators proposed a $7,000 fine against Ventra Ionia Main, saying a lockout device could have stopped the machine.
- In March 2017 the technician's husband filed a federal wrongful-death lawsuit against six companies involved in building, installing and servicing the line.
- In September 2021 a federal judge allowed a product liability claim over the line's control programming to proceed against integrator Prodomax Automation.
- In November 2021 the estate reached a confidential settlement with Prodomax partway through trial.
Sources
- FY15 Fatalities and Catastrophes To DateOSHA, August 3, 2016
- Auto Worker Dies After Being Caught In Robotic MachineCBS Detroit / Associated Press, July 8, 2015
- Michigan Company Fined In Employee's Death By RobotCBS Detroit / Associated Press, January 30, 2016
- Lawsuit: Malfunctioning robot killed Michigan woman at workFox News / Newser, March 15, 2017
- Widower can proceed in lawsuit against robot installation firmBusiness Insurance, November 9, 2020
- Unintended Consequences for Software Liability?Drug & Device Law, November 26, 2021
- Man Whose Wife Was Killed by Factory Robot Settles Mid-TrialBloomberg Law, November 9, 2021